34 pages 1 hour read

The Slave Community: Plantation Life in the Antebellum South

Nonfiction | Book | Adult | Published in 1979

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Themes

The Role of Religion in History

One of John W. Blassingame’s reasons for revising and expanding The Slave Community: Plantation Life in the Antebellum South was to further investigate the role of religion in the history of slavery and the history of the South. Religion was crucial in understanding how plantation owners perceived and tried to manage slavery. As Blassingame writes in his preface to the new edition, “The white church quickly emerged as the key institution which had to be analyzed in order to understand the most crucial aspects of Southern antebellum society” (viii).

Blassingame emphasizes that religion is a powerful tool for control, survival, and resistance. White enslaved people in Islamic nations were torn between their native Christianity and the pressure to convert to Islam, with some assimilating into Arabic culture and becoming devout Muslims (60). For African American enslaved people in the South, Protestant Christianity helped them become acclimated to Southern culture—but also helped them develop their own interpretations of Christianity and their own culture. This is in contrast with the experiences of enslaved people in Latin America, where Christianity was more closed off to them (65-71).

Protestant Christianity also influenced how plantation owners treated their enslaved people, as it drove wealthy Southerner guilt over slavery (268). This guilt was recognized as enough of a threat to the continuation of slavery that politicians like John C. Calhoun and white ministers tried to separate Christianity from the issue of slavery and promoted religious pro-slavery messages (79-83). Christianity became a vehicle for enslaved people to hope to change their “earthly situation and divine retribution for the cruelty of their masters” (133). Although both Black and white ministers were encouraged to preach obedience to enslaved people (132), images and narratives from the Bible such as God’s liberation of the Jewish people from Egypt were used in spiritual gatherings and by leaders of slave revolts like Nat Turner (144-46, 221). Christianity may have initially been used by the plantation owner class to try to control enslaved people—however, its images and narratives fueled slave solidarity and acts of resistance.

The Complexity and Diversity of Slave Experience

A recurring point in The Slave Community is that there was no universal type of slave. Blassingame argues that “there were many different slave personality types…because masters varied so much in character, the system was open at certain points, and the slave quarters, religion, and family helped to shape behavior” (xii). Although he does describe similarities between enslaved people across cultures and times, his assertion is that, despite shared circumstances and responses, enslaved people in the South did not usually respond to their enslavement by “becoming abjectly docile, infantile, or submissive” (47).

Instead, Blassingame stresses that enslaved people coped and resisted in various ways, according to their individual personalities and their masters’ personalities. They turned to Christianity and its messages of hope and liberation (75), lauded rebellious folk heroes (127-30), disguised their true feelings (305), formed communities and families, taught their children tactics of survival and loyalty to their social groups (188), and often tried to escape or violently rebel. A few enslaved people did meet the image of Sambo, the submissive enslaved person, but others only performed the role, were openly defiant (204-205, 318-20), and questioned the doctrine of racial inferiority and white supremacy (306-307). Overall, Blassingame frames the average enslaved person as “obedient and deferential to his master, this was not necessarily an innate character trait” (321).

The Psychology of Oppression

One of Blassingame’s goals in revising and expanding The Slave Community is to apply psychological analysis to new evidence from mostly slave autobiographies (xi). Although he emphasizes the diversity in how enslaved people adapted to and resisted slavery, he still argues that there are comparative points between different places where slavery was practiced and different experiences within authoritarian institutions. For example, Blassingame calls attention to how prisons acknowledged high-status prisoners by giving them better jobs as a “means of control” (326), similar to how plantation owners recruited certain enslaved people to serve as drivers (258-60). He notes that even in Nazi concentration camps, some inmates managed to have a “reaction…that was not simply submission”—despite the oppressive atmosphere making an “inmate’s sole interest [...] self-preservation” (328). Likewise, enslaved people in the South preserved their individuality and sense of community.

For Blassingame, the psychological theories of Henry Stack Sullivan show that enslaved people molded their behavior according to the institution of slavery and their masters’ expectations, but this did not mean that they internalized their subordination (284-90). Constant, violent coercion and cruel treatment made it difficult for enslaved people to retain their individuality and resist—but because many had religion and community to define themselves, they retained their dignity (310-11).

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock Icon

Unlock all 34 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 9,100+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools